The Fleet Management Scenario: The Disjointed Dispatcher

Imagine you are managing a logistics company. You have Drivers, Vehicles, Maintenance Logs, and Service Zones. Your data is stored across various PDFs, manuals, and databases.

The Query: "Find any drivers currently operating in high-risk weather zones whose vehicles are overdue for a safety inspection."

Why Standard RAG Fails

Traditional RAG relies on Vector Similarity. When you ask this question:

  1. It finds chunks about "Weather Risks".
  2. It finds chunks about "Safety Inspection Schedules".
  3. It finds chunks about "Driver Assignments".

But because these facts live in different documents (or different parts of the same document), the vector search doesn't know Sarah (Driver) is in Zone A (Risk) and driving Truck 42 (Overdue). It retrieves the pieces but can't connect them.

The Knowledge Graph Solution

GraphRAG transforms these isolated chunks into a connected web of facts. Here is how that same data looks in a Knowledge Graph:

graph TD
    Driver[Sarah Connor] -- ASSIGNED_TO --> Vehicle[Truck 42]
    Vehicle -- OVERDUE --> Inspection[Safety Audit]
    Driver -- CURRENTLY_IN --> Zone[Zone Alpha]
    Zone -- HAS_STATUS --> Risk[Severe Weather Warning]
    Risk -- IMPACTS --> Zone

The "Multi-hop" Traversal

With this structure, the AI doesn't "guess" based on similarity. It traverses:

  • Start at Severe Weather Warning → Find Zone Alpha
  • Find all Drivers in Zone Alpha → Identified Sarah Connor
  • Follow Sarah Connor to Truck 42
  • Check if Truck 42 has an OVERDUE relationship to an Inspection
This is called Multi-hop Reasoning.It’s the difference between looking up a word in a dictionary and following a trail of breadcrumbs to a specific destination.

Code Comparison: Search vs. Traversal

search Standard RAG

Vector Search (Approximate)

# Python (Pseudocode)
results = vector_db.search(
    "weather risks and safety inspections",
    top_k=5
)
# LLM tries to "hallucinate" the connections 
# between unrelated text chunks.
hub GraphRAG

Cypher Query (Deterministic)

// Neo4j Cypher
MATCH (d:Driver)-[:IN]->(z:Zone {risk: 'High'})
MATCH (d)-[:DRIVES]->(v:Vehicle)
MATCH (v)-[:HAS_STATUS]->(s:Status {type: 'Overdue'})
RETURN d.name, v.id, z.name

Behind the Scenes: The Prompt Difference

The real magic of GraphRAG happens in the context window. Let’s look at exactly what the LLM sees in each mode when we ask: "Find drivers in high-risk zones with unsafe vehicles."

description RAG Prompt

Disconnected Fragments

DATA:
- Driver Sarah Connor has 10 years experience.
- Truck42 missed its safety inspection.
- Severe Weather Alert for Zone Alpha.

QUERY: Find drivers in high-risk zones...

The LLM has no evidence that Sarah is in Zone Alpha or driving Truck42.

hub GraphRAG Prompt

Structured Traversal

DATA (Traversed Path):
Sarah Connor -> DRIVES -> Truck42
Sarah Connor -> CURRENT_IN -> Zone Alpha
WeatherWarning -> AFFECTS -> Zone Alpha
Truck42 -> STATUS -> Maintenance Overdue

QUERY: Find drivers in high-risk zones...

The LLM now has 100% deterministic proof of the connection.

The Result: Precision vs. Uncertainty

When you run the demo, the difference in the final answer is striking:

Standard RAG Result: "No drivers could be identified as being in a high-risk zone... Please confirm current driver assignments to assess combined risks."

 

GraphRAG Result: "URGENT ALERT: Sarah Connor (Truck42) is operating in Zone Alpha under Severe Weather conditions with overdue maintenance. Immediate action required."

Automated Verification

A secondary benefit of GraphRAG is Observability and Explainability. Because the system traverses a graph, it can automatically generate a visualization of its reasoning path.

The included Python demo script generates a graph_visualization.png file (using NetworkX and Matplotlib) every time it runs, allowing users to verify that the "Multi-hop" logic is correctly mapping to reality.

Try it Yourself: Hands-on Demo

Here is a practical couple of Python demonstration scripts that lets you run this exact scenario on your own machine.

Step 1:Install dependencies

                
websockets>=12.0
google-auth>=2.23.0
certifi>=2023.7.22
requests>=2.31.0
google-cloud-storage>=2.13.0
fastapi>=0.104.0
uvicorn>=0.23.2
google-generativeai>=0.3.0
networkx>=3.0
matplotlib>=3.8.0
            
pip install -r requirements.txt

Step 2: Run the graphrag_demo.py script

graphrag_demo.py
python3 graphrag_demo.py

The script will output a side-by-side comparison of how a standard RAG system (Vector Similarity) retrieves disconnected facts versus how a GraphRAG system (Traversals) identifies the exact "Multi-hop" path to the answer.

Clinical Case Study: Causal Link Discovery

Beyond fleet management, GraphRAG is transformative in Healthcare. In clinical settings, document fragmentation often hides critical causal links between medications and symptoms.

The Clinical Query: "Patient John Doe has a persistent dry cough. Should we prescribe a cough suppressant or evaluate his current medication?"
graph LR
    Patient[John Doe] -- TAKES_MED --> Med[Lisinopril]
    Med -- TREATS --> Cond[Hypertension]
    Med -- CAUSES_SIDE_EFFECT --> Symptom[Persistent Cough]
    Patient -- EXHIBITS --> Symptom

In this case, a standard RAG search might find a doctor's note about the cough and a separate prescription for Lisinopril, but fail to link them. GraphRAG immediately sees the CAUSES_SIDE_EFFECT edge, allowing the AI to recommend a medication review rather than just treating the symptom.

Run the Clinical Demo

graphrag_clinical_demo.py
python3 graphrag_clinical_demo.py

This script demonstrates how traversal identifies that the cough is a side effect of the patient's existing medication, rather than a new condition requiring a new prescription.

GraphRAG Clinical Demo

Key Takeaways

  • Precision over Recall: GraphRAG gives you the exact path, not just a list of related documents.
  • Explainable AI: You can see exactly which nodes were traversed to reach the answer.
  • Data Integrity: Centralizing entities prevents "Sarah Connor" from being treated differently than "S. Connor" across different documents.

Want to see the underlying data model?
Check out our guide on Foundational vs Decorative Schema to learn how to design these graphs.